Criminal Law

The appellant had created a forged general power of Attorney from the respondent in his name with regard to his lands and sold it. The respondent filed an FIR under section 419 or 420 IPC and the appellant was acquitted of the charge. The second FIR was filed under sections 467,468 and 471 IPC. Held, […]

It is stated that the appellants have been released on temporary bail, furlough and parole on several occasions and there is no report of their having misconducted themselves or indulged in any criminal activities. The appellants were directed to be released on bail subject to the conditions that they shall not enter the state of

The Supreme court granted relief of clubbing together the two suits pending before the trial court. The respondent in his application stated certain facts that were not accurate. The explanation offered by him in his rejoinder seemed reasonable more particularly when he has tendered unconditional apology in his rejoinder. No prima facie case is made

Referring to Shivshankar Singh v. State of Bihar (2012) 1 SCC 130, this court observed that it is evident that the law does not prohibit filing or entertaining of the second complaint even on the same facts provided the earlier complaint has been decided on the basis of insufficient material or the order has been

Protection of women from Domestic Violence Act,2005-Ss. 18 and 20, the court has to be prima facie satisfied that there have been instances of Domestic Violence– there are no specific allegations as to how other relatives of Appellant 14 (husband) have caused the acts of Domestic Violence- the criminal case of domestic violence against them