Income Tax

Ss. 260-A, 269 and 120 — Determination of Appropriate High Court for filing appeal or reference against order of ITAT Bench exercising jurisdiction over more than one State

As benches of the ITAT exercise jurisdiction over more than one state, Explanation to Standing Order No. 1 of 1954 and Standing Order No. 1 of 1967 issued under the Rules prescribe that, the jurisdiction of the ITAT should be based on the location of the Assessing Officer. The same principle should apply for determining […]

Ss. 260-A, 269 and 120 — Determination of Appropriate High Court for filing appeal or reference against order of ITAT Bench exercising jurisdiction over more than one State Read More »

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Ss. 39, 16, 49(2) and 59 — Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST dt. 29-12-2017:

Rectification of return, on the premise of Form GSTR-2A being non-operational at the relevant time is not permissible. The factum of non-operability of Form GSTR-2A, is flimsy plea taken by writ petitioner, it is only a facilitator for taking an informed decision while doing self-assessment [Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd., (2022) 4 SCC

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Ss. 39, 16, 49(2) and 59 — Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST dt. 29-12-2017: Read More »

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 14-A — Disallowance on expenditure incurred for earning tax-free income in cases where assessees do not maintain separate accounts for the investments and other expenditures incurred for earning the tax-free income

The proportionate disallowance of interest is not warranted under S. 14-A for investments made in tax free bonds/securities which yield tax-free dividend and interest to assessee Banks in those situations where, interest-free own funds available with the assessee, exceeded their investments. Held, agree with the view taken by learned ITAT. Para 31 [South Indian Bank

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 14-A — Disallowance on expenditure incurred for earning tax-free income in cases where assessees do not maintain separate accounts for the investments and other expenditures incurred for earning the tax-free income Read More »

Income Tax Act, 1961— Date for reckoning period of limitation prescribed under S. 263(2)

The word used S. 263 is “made” and not “received”. Hence, if the order under S. 263 was made/passed within the period of two years from the end of financial year in which order sought to be revised was passed, such an order would not be beyond the period of limitation prescribed under S. 263(2).

Income Tax Act, 1961— Date for reckoning period of limitation prescribed under S. 263(2) Read More »

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days

Held, unequals are being treated equally in that  no differentiation is made by the third proviso between the assessees who are responsible for delaying the proceedings and assessees who are not so responsible- since the objective was automatic vacation of stay granted on the completion of 365 days whether or not the assessee is responsible

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days Read More »

Income Tax — Mutuality Doctrine: Applicability and basis of Mutuality Doctrine, explained in detail

Held, there are three conditions/tests to prove the existence of mutuality: Identity of the contributors to the fund and the recipients from the fund; Treatment of the company, though incorporated as a mere entity for the convenience of the members and policy holders, in other words, as an instrument obedient to their mandate, and; Impossibility

Income Tax — Mutuality Doctrine: Applicability and basis of Mutuality Doctrine, explained in detail Read More »

S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days.

Held, unequals are being treated equally in that  no differentiation is made by the third proviso between the assessees who are responsible for delaying the proceedings and assessees who are not so responsible- since the objective was automatic vacation of stay granted on the completion of 365 days whether or not the assessee is responsible

S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days. Read More »

Concealment of income under Ss. 143, 144 and 68 stand dispelled by the proper disclosure of sources of income at penalty proceedings stage

held- The appellant assessee despite being given sufficient opportunity, failed to prove the correctness and genuineness of his claim. Resultantly the said transactions were assumed as bogus entries (Para 15) Once sources of income were disclosed on affidavit and recorded statements of persons concerned in penalty proceedings, held, it could no longer be said that

Concealment of income under Ss. 143, 144 and 68 stand dispelled by the proper disclosure of sources of income at penalty proceedings stage Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.