Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 498-A and 304-B — Dowry death and cruelty — Duty of court while proceeding against relatives:

The courts should be careful in proceeding against the distant relatives in crimes pertaining to matrimonial disputes and dowry deaths and must keep in mind that relatives of the husband should not be roped in on the basis of omnibus allegations unless specific instances of their involvement in the crime are made out. None of

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 498-A and 304-B — Dowry death and cruelty — Duty of court while proceeding against relatives: Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 190(1)(b) r/w Ss. 173, 193 & 319 and Ss. 161 & 164 —power of the Magistrate to summon a person on Protest petition not accused in Report after taking cognizance of offence on basis of police report

Even after process has been issued against some accused on one date, held, process can still be issued by the Magistrate against some other person against whom there is some material on record, but whose name is not included as accused in the charge-sheet. Lastly, Magistrate or court need not wait till stage of S. 319 CrPC to

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 190(1)(b) r/w Ss. 173, 193 & 319 and Ss. 161 & 164 —power of the Magistrate to summon a person on Protest petition not accused in Report after taking cognizance of offence on basis of police report Read More »

Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Exercise of review jurisdiction — Necessity of Proper mode of Reasoned order

It is necessary for reviewing Court to demonstrate the error(s) apparent on the face of the record which warranted the review, with reasons. In the present case, except stating that “it is noticed that there is apparent error on the face of record which calls for interference”, nothing has been mentioned on what was that

Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Exercise of review jurisdiction — Necessity of Proper mode of Reasoned order Read More »

Contract Act, 1872 — Claim of restitution under S. 65, when the contract is found to be void on ground of illegality — Relevance of Role of party claiming restitution in relation to such illegality

Principle of in pari delicto for denial of restitution is applicable where the claimant is more responsible for the illegality or the parties are considered to be equally responsible. In adjudicating a claim of restitution under S. 65 of the Contract Act, held, the court must determine the illegality which caused the contract to become

Contract Act, 1872 — Claim of restitution under S. 65, when the contract is found to be void on ground of illegality — Relevance of Role of party claiming restitution in relation to such illegality Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 319 — Caution in exercise of power

Principles reiterated regarding exercise of power under the section. Strong and cogent evidence against person(s) concerned sought to be added as accused under S. 319 is necessary. High court failed to consider even basic principles laid down by five-judge bench ruling in Hardeep Singh, (2014) 3 SCC 92- Penal Code 1860, S 302. Appeal allowed.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 319 — Caution in exercise of power Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 —Grant of bail under S. 439 — Mandatory requirement of recording of reasons

Requirement of giving reasons for the decision is of the essence and is virtually a part of “due process”. Clarified, however, that while the court is not required to give elaborate reasons while granting bail, an order dehors any reasoning whatsoever cannot result in grant of bail. Where the accused summoned under sec 319 of

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 —Grant of bail under S. 439 — Mandatory requirement of recording of reasons Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.