Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 167(2) — Default bail — Grounds on which may be claimed

(A) Charge-sheet submitted by investigating agency which did not have, or, had lost the jurisdiction to conduct the investigation. (B) Even if the investigating agency in question, had jurisdiction or retained its jurisdiction, charge-sheet submitted before court which had no jurisdiction in respect of the offence(s) concerned. Thus, default bail claimed on ground that as […]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 167(2) — Default bail — Grounds on which may be claimed Read More »

Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 — Ss. 3 and 4: Benefit of releasing convicted accused on probation, when to be granted, explained

Held, having regard to the fact there are no criminal antecedents against the appellants, the court is inclined to give them the benefit of releasing them on probation of good conduct. In that view of the matter, while maintaining the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants, It is further directed that if the appellants

Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 — Ss. 3 and 4: Benefit of releasing convicted accused on probation, when to be granted, explained Read More »

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — S. 13(1)(i-b) and S. 13(1) Expln. Scope and meaning of “Desertion” as a ground for divorce

Desertion means intentional abandonment of one spouse by other without consent of other and without a reasonable cause. There should be animus deserendi on part of deserting spouse. Whether a case of desertion is established or not will depend on peculiar facts of each case. It is a matter of drawing an inference based on

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — S. 13(1)(i-b) and S. 13(1) Expln. Scope and meaning of “Desertion” as a ground for divorce Read More »

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — S. 24 — Relevant factors for Interim maintenance — Entitlement to and Quantum of

Reduction in capacity to pay of the person liable to pay the maintenance is relevant factor while determining maintenance. A final decision shall be taken by the family court concerned as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months from the date of communication of this order. [Uma Priyadarshini S. v. Suchith K. Nair, (2022) 5 SCC 659]

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — S. 24 — Relevant factors for Interim maintenance — Entitlement to and Quantum of Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 and 148 — Large number of accused involved

For determination of culpability of each accused there is necessity of parsing evidence carefully in respect of each accused. High court has unnecessarily given weightage to some minor contradictions, which are not material contradictions that can affect the case of prosecution as a whole. The presence of injured witness ought not to have been doubted

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 and 148 — Large number of accused involved Read More »

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 23 R. 3 — Modification of consent judgment/decree

Modification of consent judgment/decree is not permissible when not vitiated by fraud, misrepresentation or a patent or obvious mistake. Application seeking modification of consent judgment/decree filed under S. 152 must be dismissed, even on considering such application as one under proviso to Or. 23 R. 3 r/w S. 151, when it did not meet the

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 23 R. 3 — Modification of consent judgment/decree Read More »

Insurance — General Insurance — Theft, Burglary and Property Loss Insurance

Delay in informing theft to insurer i.e. alleged violation of a condition of insurance contract in this regard is insufficient to deny claim of insured when FIR regarding theft lodged and also accused arrested and charge-sheeted i.e. when the claim is otherwise genuine and not disputed to be genuine by insurer. Held, insurer could not

Insurance — General Insurance — Theft, Burglary and Property Loss Insurance Read More »

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 37 R. 2 — Summary suit — Principles to be followed for the grant of Leave to defend

While dealing with an application seeking leave to defend, held, it would not be a correct approach to proceed as if denying leave is the rule or that leave to defend is to be granted only in exceptional cases or only in cases where defence would appear to be a meritorious one. On the issue

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 37 R. 2 — Summary suit — Principles to be followed for the grant of Leave to defend Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.