Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

S 14 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Ss. 138/141

Quashment of proceedings against corporate debtor under S. 138 NI Act after issuance of moratorium under S. 14 IBC:  Ss. 138/141 of the NI Act proceeding against corporate debtor is covered by S. 14 (1)(a) IBC as held in P. Mohanraj, (2021) 6 SCC 258. Hence, corporate debtor cannot be proceeded against under S. 138 […]

S 14 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Ss. 138/141 Read More »

Constitution of India – Maintainability of writ petition for proceedings under SARFAESI Act under Art. 226

If proceedings are initiated under the SARFAESI Act and/or any proposed action is to be taken and the borrower is aggrieved by any of the actions of the private bank/bank/ARC, borrower has to avail the remedy under the SARFAESI Act and no writ petition would lie and/or is maintainable and/or entertainable. Relief under Article 226/227

Constitution of India – Maintainability of writ petition for proceedings under SARFAESI Act under Art. 226 Read More »

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Ss. 3(b), 5(m) and 5/6 or 7/8 — Determination of “Penetrative sexual assault” as well as “aggravated penetrative sexual assault”

As per S. 5(m), penetrative sexual assault being committed on victim girl aged four years (below twelve years), held, the same is also “aggravated penetrative sexual assault” punishable under S. 6. Concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below that the accused tried to commit rape on victim girl found to be fully supported by

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Ss. 3(b), 5(m) and 5/6 or 7/8 — Determination of “Penetrative sexual assault” as well as “aggravated penetrative sexual assault” Read More »

Crimes against Women and Children- Protection of Women from Domestic violence Act, 2005- Ss. 19(1)(f) and 2(s)- Alternate equivalent accommodation and the extent to which it requires to be equivalent

Held, similar doesn’t mean identical in terms of area, facilities and luxuries. In the present case wife in first place not choosing any house as per her choice and secondly rejecting all properties identified by architect appointed under court order to identify similar properties, held is unreasonable. Alternate prayer for payment of Rs. 35.37 lakhs

Crimes against Women and Children- Protection of Women from Domestic violence Act, 2005- Ss. 19(1)(f) and 2(s)- Alternate equivalent accommodation and the extent to which it requires to be equivalent Read More »

Environment Law — General Principles of Environmental Law —Delhi Metro Providing effective transportation vis-à-vis ecology — Phase IV of MRTS Project:

Earlier phases of project had already resulted in loss of vegetation as well as flora and fauna in certain areas. Phase IV of MRTS Project may be a further threat to the ecology of NCT of Delhi/NCR. Effectuation of precautionary principle as well as principle of sustainable development, by ensuring citizens’ participation in the preservation

Environment Law — General Principles of Environmental Law —Delhi Metro Providing effective transportation vis-à-vis ecology — Phase IV of MRTS Project: Read More »

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 41 R. 31 — Citing reasons to be assigned for decision by first appellate court in First appeal is the mandatory requirement of compliance with Or. 41 R. 31

First appellate court is mandatorily required to comply with requirements of Or. 41 R. 31 and non-observance of these requirements lead to infirmity in judgment. Appellate court’s jurisdiction involves a rehearing of appeal on questions of law as well as fact. First appeal is a valuable right, and, at that stage, all questions of fact

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 41 R. 31 — Citing reasons to be assigned for decision by first appellate court in First appeal is the mandatory requirement of compliance with Or. 41 R. 31 Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 482 — Failure to exercise quashment power — When not proper

In this case of alleged misappropriation of monies of complainant and others, main allegations are against other co-accused, the only allegation against the appellant is that they have purchased the property. Even from averments s and allegations in the FIR, it cannot be said that there is a prima facie case made out against appellants.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 482 — Failure to exercise quashment power — When not proper Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.