Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 378(4) & (5) and 386(a) — Grant of leave to appeal against order of acquittal by trial court

High Court must set forth its reasons, indicating at least in brief, an application of mind to nature of evidence and findings which have been arrived at. Not doing so, is not consistent with the duty which is cast upon High Court while determing whether leave should be granted to appeal against order of acquittal. […]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 378(4) & (5) and 386(a) — Grant of leave to appeal against order of acquittal by trial court Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 432, 433 and 433-A — Power of appropriate Government to suspend, remit and commute sentences

Remission policies may be composite ones referable both to S. 432/S. 433 CrPC and Art. 161 of the Constitution. Remission power exercisable under a particular remission policy whether would be one exercisable: (A) under S. 432/S. 433 CrPC, and/or (B) under Art. 161 of the Constitution, inter alia, depends on: the terms of the remission

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 432, 433 and 433-A — Power of appropriate Government to suspend, remit and commute sentences Read More »

Constitution of India – Interpretation of Preventive detention laws in the light of Arts. 21 & 22 and Art. 19

When a person is preventively detained Arts. 21 & 22 are attracted and not Art. 19. Hence, to tear observations made in Madhu Limaye case out of context would be fraught with danger when it comes to liberty of person under Art. 21. Hence, contention that liberal meaning must be given to the expression “public

Constitution of India – Interpretation of Preventive detention laws in the light of Arts. 21 & 22 and Art. 19 Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 482 and 156(3) — Extraordinary relief of stay of further proceedings in complaint cases, including stay on arrest of accused persons

Grant of, by High Court under S. 482: It is permissible for High Court to pass an interim order under S. 482 CrPC of the nature impugned herein, in exceptional cases with caution and circumspection, giving at least brief reasons. What is not permissible is the tendency of the courts to pass blanket, cryptic, laconic, non-speaking

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 482 and 156(3) — Extraordinary relief of stay of further proceedings in complaint cases, including stay on arrest of accused persons Read More »

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days

Held, unequals are being treated equally in that  no differentiation is made by the third proviso between the assessees who are responsible for delaying the proceedings and assessees who are not so responsible- since the objective was automatic vacation of stay granted on the completion of 365 days whether or not the assessee is responsible

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days Read More »

Disaster Management Act, 2005 — Ss. 12(iii), 48, 6(1) and 6(2)(g) – constitution of India (Art.21)— Notified disaster

Ex gratia monetary compensation to families of deceased who have succumbed to pandemic of COVID-19: Word “shall” used in S. 12, held, cannot be interpreted and considered as “may”. It is mandatory for National Authority to recommend guidelines for minimum standards of relief to be provided to persons affected by disasters including ex gratia assistance

Disaster Management Act, 2005 — Ss. 12(iii), 48, 6(1) and 6(2)(g) – constitution of India (Art.21)— Notified disaster Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.