Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 197 — Previous sanction for prosecution of public servant

S.197 CrPC seeks to protect officer from unnecessary harassment, who is accused of offence committed while acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duties and, thus, prohibits court from taking cognizance of such offence except with previous sanction of competent authority. At the same time, such shield cannot protect corrupt officers and […]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 197 — Previous sanction for prosecution of public servant Read More »

Service Law — Pay — Entitlement to, if any, to Revision of pay —— Factors to be considered when employer does decide to revise pay and Relevance of Financial constraints of employer

Principles clarified re three broad sets of employers viz. (i) Employers in organised sector like industry; (ii) Employers in public sector undertakings including Boards and Corporations and other establishments which meet test of “State” within meaning of Art. 12 of the Constitution; and (iii) Central and State Governments proper as employers. As far as first

Service Law — Pay — Entitlement to, if any, to Revision of pay —— Factors to be considered when employer does decide to revise pay and Relevance of Financial constraints of employer Read More »

Service Law – Antecedents/Character for Appointment of Police and Involvement in offence(s) involving moral turpitude/violent activities:

Determination of entitlement to appointment in case of offences involving moral turpitude, violent activities would depend on nature of offence charged with and result of same.  Mere acquittal not sufficient but rather entitlement would depend on whether it was clean acquittal based on total absence of evidence. If acquittal is recorded in a case involving

Service Law – Antecedents/Character for Appointment of Police and Involvement in offence(s) involving moral turpitude/violent activities: Read More »

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Ss. 238-A and 7: S. 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 i.e. for exclusion of time in proceeding bona fide wrong court or forum

Held, is applicable to applications preferred under S. 7 IBC once it is shown that all conditions for application of S. 14 of the Limitation Act are satisfied in the facts of the case. The conditions for exclusion of time under S.14 of the Limitation Act are that the earlier proceedings should have been for

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Ss. 238-A and 7: S. 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 i.e. for exclusion of time in proceeding bona fide wrong court or forum Read More »

Matrimonial Dispute-Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 25 — Transfer of cases

In this case, prayer for transfer of case, declined. However, directions on manner of conducting of proceedings were issued. Trial court was directed to conduct proceedings online for effective participation of parties, if facility available. In the event, the petitioner’s presence is necessary; the court shall fix such successive/ consecutive date(s) as may be convenient

Matrimonial Dispute-Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 25 — Transfer of cases Read More »

Income Tax — Mutuality Doctrine: Applicability and basis of Mutuality Doctrine, explained in detail

Held, there are three conditions/tests to prove the existence of mutuality: Identity of the contributors to the fund and the recipients from the fund; Treatment of the company, though incorporated as a mere entity for the convenience of the members and policy holders, in other words, as an instrument obedient to their mandate, and; Impossibility

Income Tax — Mutuality Doctrine: Applicability and basis of Mutuality Doctrine, explained in detail Read More »

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 —— When can the Residuary power of NCLT under S. 60(5) be exercised

Held, Considering the text of S. 60(5)(c) and the interpretation of similar provisions in other insolvency related statutes, NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes, which arise solely from or which relate to the insolvency of the corporate debtor. However, in doing do, NCLT and NCLAT have to ensure that they do not usurp the legitimate

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 —— When can the Residuary power of NCLT under S. 60(5) be exercised Read More »

— Right to identity under Arts. 21 and 19 – Sanctity of identity and protection of identity of individual is guaranteed under the Constitution

One is entitled to correction and / or modification of name recorded in the examination certificate  and other changes to information contained therein. CBSE examination bye lawsrestricting scope of permissible corrections/ changes in certificates issued by it is unreasonable. Jigya Yadav v. CBSE, (2021) 7 SCC 535

— Right to identity under Arts. 21 and 19 – Sanctity of identity and protection of identity of individual is guaranteed under the Constitution Read More »

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Limitation period for filing of reply/response to complaint by respondent/opposite party under Ss. 13(2)(a) and (b)

Law laid down by five-Judge Bench in Hilli, (2020) 5 SCC 757 that limitation mandatorily cannot be extended beyond prescribed period of 45 days (i.e. period of 30 days along with discretionary extension of time up to 15 days), held, operates prospectively. Because the said judgment was to operate prospectively and the written statement as

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Limitation period for filing of reply/response to complaint by respondent/opposite party under Ss. 13(2)(a) and (b) Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.