Penal Code

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 406, 420, 467, 468, 417 and 418 — Quashing of FIR — Dispute being essentially a civil dispute in nature

A breach of contract does not give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction. noting   that   the   present   dispute   is   entirely   with   respect   to property and more particularly buying and selling thereof a perusal of the record in no uncertain terms reflects the dispute as being of a civil nature. Further, merely the allegation of […]

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 406, 420, 467, 468, 417 and 418 — Quashing of FIR — Dispute being essentially a civil dispute in nature Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302, 376 & 201 — Brutal rape and murder of minor — Death sentence

The heinous nature of crime like that of present one, in brutal rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl child, definitely discloses aggravating circumstances, particularly when the manner of its commission shows depravity and shocks the conscience. But at the same time, it is noticeable that the appellant has no criminal antecedents, comes from a

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302, 376 & 201 — Brutal rape and murder of minor — Death sentence Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 420, 419, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B — Quashment of charge-sheet under — Whether warranted — Absence of prima facie evidence

Mere failure to verify the documents, without any further evidence against officers of Selection Committee, whether enough to implicate them, determined. Appellants having relied on the documents placed on record without any verification, on the assumption that the documents being genuine and having recommended the case for appointment, held, there was insufficient evidence to proceed

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 420, 419, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B — Quashment of charge-sheet under — Whether warranted — Absence of prima facie evidence Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 86 and 302 — Entitlement to Defence of being under the influence of liquor under Patricide (killing of father)

Mere intoxication, held, not enough to attract S. 86. Son Murdered Father- a case of patricide albeit both the father and the son were drinking together. The effect of alcohol may have resulted in a quarrel inter se the father and the son. In this altercation, the appellant picked up a Nagar Wood and inflicted few injuries to his father,

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 86 and 302 — Entitlement to Defence of being under the influence of liquor under Patricide (killing of father) Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302/34 and 307/34: In the event of failure of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused beyond the reasonable doubt, the accused will be entitled to be acquitted from all the charges

In this case, around 6:30 p.m., Shri Iqbal Bahadur Saxena, Principal of the Chandra Shekhar Azad Inter-College, since deceased was sitting with his family physician and private practitioner Dr. Asghar Ali in the verandah outside his office, situated in the college campus. He sent his security guard Fazal Maseeh to fetch an empty bottle of

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302/34 and 307/34: In the event of failure of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused beyond the reasonable doubt, the accused will be entitled to be acquitted from all the charges Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 or 304 Pt. II — Effect of Absence of intention to kill would amount to Murder or culpable homicide

In this case, deceased was assaulted by three accused including appellant (A-2) who attacked deceased with wooden log on his head and pushed him down. The cause of death of the deceased was due to shock and haemorrhage on account of head injuries and due to subdural haematoma on the left frontal parietal region with

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 or 304 Pt. II — Effect of Absence of intention to kill would amount to Murder or culpable homicide Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 and 376(2)(i) — Child rape and murder —Defect in investigation, such as non-conducting DNA profiling in terms of S. 53-A CrPC cannot be permitted to decide the fate of the trial—duty of court:

Solely on account of defects or shortcomings in investigation an accused is not entitled to get acquitted and, thus, lapse or omission (purposeful or otherwise) to carry out DNA profiling, by itself, cannot be permitted to decide the fate of a trial for the offence of rape especially, when it is combined with the commission

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 and 376(2)(i) — Child rape and murder —Defect in investigation, such as non-conducting DNA profiling in terms of S. 53-A CrPC cannot be permitted to decide the fate of the trial—duty of court: Read More »

error: Content is protected !!

Terms And Condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.